Discussion about this post

User's avatar
James M.'s avatar

This doesn't directly address your post (which is great) but: I think the proper basis for mental healthcare is not to be personally happy or to avoid symptoms or improve mood-it's to be a better (more ethical) and helpful person to those around you. Once you reframe mental healthcare in that way so much of what seems bizarre and nonsensical disappears. A lot of the labelling and the online therapy community you reference here is really just semi-pathological self-absorption, which is not good for society or for individual psychological health.

Be more virtuous and stronger and more useful... and happiness will follow. Obsess about your mood and your 'peace' and your 'truth' and you will never find happiness. Humans are simply not normally built that way.

If you want to assess whether your relationship is good, ask yourself: does this person improve my work performance? Increase my kindness to strangers? Does having this person in my life make me a better friend? Does having this person in my life help me make good decisions? If a person is improving your experience of being an employee and a friend and a citizen that person is probably good for you... if he's not then there might be an issue. Just my opinion!

https://jmpolemic.substack.com/p/virtue-struggle-and-eudaimonia-begun?r=1neg52

Sophia Treece's avatar

This is fantastic. I wonder, too, if a large part of the problem is the fact that women are physically bonding early to boyfriends through careless sex, without vetting compatibility or even the quality of the man and his treatment of them, and then are desperately trying to justify their ill-made bond through this sort of mindset.

179 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?